Index

Rarebit reports and meeting abstracts

This page lists all presentations known as of October, 2017. To add a presentation, please send a note.

Rarebit Perimetry reports

  1. Aleci C, Usai T. Testing spatial detection and light sensitivity in homonymous hemianopia by rarebit and conventional automated perimetry. Open Ophthalmol J 2:153-159, 2008 PubMed
  2. Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Indian J Ophthalmol 59: S53-58, 2011 PubMed
  3. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Parisi L, Zeppieri M. Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 89:180-4, 2005 PubMed
  4. Celebisoy N, Öztürk T, Köse T. Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of visual field defects in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol 20:756-62, 2010 PubMed
  5. Chin CF, Yip LW, Sim DC, Yeo AC. Rarebit perimetry: normative values and test-retest variability. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 39: 752-9, 2011 PubMed
  6. Corallo G, Bagnis A, Scotto R, Iester M, Calabria G. Rarebit perimetry in soggetti sani: effetto apprendimento e fluttuazione a breve e lungo termine. Ottica fisiopat 11:139-146, 2006
  7. Corallo G, Iester M, Scotto R, Calabria G, Traverso CE. Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol. 8:205-11, 2008 PubMed
  8. Frisén L. New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing. Vision Res 42:1931-9, 2002 PubMed
  9. Frisén L. Spatial vision in visually asymptomatic subjects at high risk for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 74:1145-7, 2003 PubMed
  10. Frisén L. Vigabatrin-associated loss of vision: rarebit perimetry illuminates dose-damage relationship. Acta Ophthalmol 82: 54-8, 2004 PubMed
  11. Frisén L. Closing perimetry’s sensitivity gap: a rarebit approach. In: Perimetry Update 2002/2003, D Henson and M Wall, eds. Kugler, The Hague 2004, pp 213 – 219
  12. Frisén L. Rarebit perimetrisi. In: Görme Alani El Kitabi, Ed. Aydin P. Aksu Basim Yayin Dagitim, Istanbul 2005; 61 – 64 (in Turkish)
  13. Frisén L, Jensen C. How robust is the optic chiasm? Perimetric and neuro-imaging correlations. Acta Neurol Scand 117, 198-204, 2008 PubMed
  14. Gedik D, Akman A, Akova Y. Efficiency of rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients. Br J Ophthalmol 91: 1065 - 1069, 2007 PubMed
  15. Hackett, DA. Exploring the mechanisms of rarebit perimetry. Masters Thesis, University of Melbourne, 2009 link
  16. Hackett DA, Anderson AJ. Determining mechanisms of visual loss in glaucoma using rarebit perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 88:48-55, 2010 PubMed
  17. Hellgren K, Hellström A, Martin L. Visual fields and optic disc morphology in very low birthweight adolescents examined with magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Acta Ophthalmol 87: 843 - 8, 2009 PubMed
  18. Jacobson L, Flodmark O, Martin L. Visual field defects in prematurely born patients with white matter damage of immaturity: a multiple-case study. Acta Ophthalmol 84: 357 – 362, 2006 PubMed
  19. Jacobson L, Lennartsson F, Pansell T, Oqvist Seimyr G, Martin L. Mechanisms compensating for visual field restriction in adolescents with damage to the retro-geniculate visual system. Eye 26: 1437-1445, 2012 PubMed
  20. Johnson CA, Wall M, Thompson HS. A history of perimetry and visual field testing. Optom Vis Sci 88:E8-E15, 2011 PubMed
  21. Joltikov KA, de Castro VM, Davila JR, Anand R, Khan SM, Farbman N, Jackson GR, Johnson CA, Gardner TW. Multidimensional functional and structural evaluation reveals neuroretinal impairment in early diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:277-290, 2017 PubMed
  22. Katsanos A, Labiris G, Fanariotis M, Tsirouki T, Chatzoulis D. The relationship between Rarebit perimetry and OCT-derived retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 86: 871-876, 2008 PubMed
  23. Lin SR, Fijalkowski N, Lin BR, Li F, Singh K, Chang RT. Parallel rarebits: A novel, large-scale visual field screening method. Clin Exp Optom 97: 528–533, 2014 PubMed
  24. Lin SR, Lai IN, Dutta S, Singh K, Chang RT. Quantitative Measurement of Fixation Stability During RareBit Perimetry and Humphrey Visual Field Testing. J Glaucoma 24: 100-104, 2015 PubMed
  25. Martin L. Rarebit and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in children and young adults. Acta Ophthalmol 83:670 -7, 2005 PubMed
  26. Martin L, Aring E, Landgren M, Hellström A, Andersson Grönlund M. Visual fields in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder before and after treatment with stimulants. Acta Ophthalmol 86: 259 -64, 2008 PubMed
  27. Martin L, Ley D, Marsal K, Hellström A. Visual function in young adults following intrauterine growth retardation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 41:212-8, 2004 PubMed
  28. Martin L, Nilsson A. Rarebit perimetry and optic disk topography in paediatric glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 44: 223-31, 2007 PubMed
  29. Martin L, Wanger P. New perimetric techniques. A comparison between rarebit and FDT perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 13: 278 – 282, 2004 PubMed
  30. McKendrick AM. Recent developments in perimetry: test stimuli and procedures. Clin Exp Optom. 88:73-80, 2005 PubMed
  31. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L, Brusini P. Rarebit perimetry in normals: test-retest variability, learning effect, normative range, influence of optical defocus and cataract extraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5320–5331, 2007 PubMed
  32. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P. Non-conventional perimetric methods in the detection of early glaucomatous functional damage. Eye 24: 835–842, 2010 PubMed
  33. Steven Houston SK, Weber ED, Koga SF, Newman SA. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry. J Neuroophthalmol 30:243-7, 2010 PubMed
  34. Törnquist AL, Olsson M, Martin L, Winiarski J, Fahnehjelm KT. Visual field results and optic disc morphology in patients treated with allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in childhood. Acta Ophthalmol 89: 62-9, 2011 PubMed
  35. Vislisel JM, Doyle CK, Johnson CA, Wall M. Variability of rarebit and standard perimetry sizes I and III in normals. Optom Vis Sci 88:635-9, 2011 PubMed
  36. Yavas GF, Küzbeci T, Öztürk F, Ermis SS. A New Visual Field Test: Rarebit Perimetry. Turk J Ophthalmol, July-August 2007
  37. Yavas GF, Küzbeci T, Eser O, Ermis SS, Cosar M Öztürk F. A new visual field test in empty sella syndrome: rarebit perimetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:628-32, 2008 PubMed

Top

Multiple Rarebit Test Reports

  1. Frisén L. Rapid assessment of neurovisual integrity using multiple rarebits. Ophthalmology 120:1756-1760, 2013 PubMed
  2. Winther C, Frisén L. New rarebit vision test captures macular deficits hidden to acuity tests. Acta Ophthalmol 93:481-485, 2015PubMed
  3. Winther C, Frisén L. Self-testing of vision in age-related macula degeneration: a longitudinal pilot study using a smartphone-based rarebit test. J Ophthalmol, vol. 2015, Article ID 285463, 2015. PubMed Free access.


Rarebit Fovea Test reports

  1. Agervi P, Nilsson M, Martin L. Foveal function in children treated for amblyopia. Acta Ophthalmol 88:222-226, 2010 PubMed
  2. de Kinkelder R, van Leeuwen TG, Verbraak FD. Detection of early-stage age related macular degeneration with a compact rarebit test. Br J Ophthalmol 96:1354-1355, 2012 PubMed
  3. Dujmović L, Benćić G, Vatavuk Z. The role of rarebit perimetry in evaluation of functional outcome after successful macular hole and epiretinal membrane surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:157-158, 2015 PubMed
  4. Frisén L. Performance of a rapid rarebit central-vision test with optic neuropathies. Optom Vis Sci 89: 1192–1195, 2012. PubMed
  5. Malmer L. Rarebit Fovea Test. Aktuell Optik Optometri 2004:4 AOO(in Swedish)
  6. Malmer L, Martin L. Microdot test of foveal function. A comparison with visual acuity at high and low contrast. Ophthal Physiol Optics 25: 81 - 86, 2005 PubMed
  7. Nilsson M. The rarebit fovea test - a new measure of visual function. PhD Thesis, Karolinska Institute, 2008 link
  8. Nilsson M, Abdiu O, Laurell CG, Martin L. Rarebit perimetry and fovea test before and after cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 88: 479 - 482, 2010 PubMed
  9. Nilsson M, Stevenson SB, Kumar G, Martin L, Brautaset RL. Fixation stability during rarebit fovea test. Clin Exp Optom 92:9-13, 2009 PubMed
  10. Nilsson, M., Svanberg, M., Schalin, S. and Brautaset, R. L. Rarebit fovea test in children: reference data for children aged six to 10 years. Clin Exp Optom 95: 48-53, 2012 PubMed
  11. Nilsson M, von Wendt G, Brautaset R, Wanger P, Martin, L. Macular structure and function and the development of retinopathy in diabetes. Clin Exp Optom 95: 306-310, 2012 PubMed
  12. Nilsson M, von Wendt G, Wanger P, Martin LM. Early detection of macular changes in patients with diabetes using rarebit fovea test and optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 91: 1596 - 1598, 2007 PubMed
  13. Nilsson M, Wanger P, Martin L. Perception of very small visual stimuli in the fovea: normative data for the rarebit fovea test. Clin Exp Optom 89:81-85, 2006 PubMed
  14. Nowomiejska K, Oleszczuk A, Zubilewicz A, Krukowski J, Mankowska A, Rejdak R, Zagórski Z. [Assessment of the macula function by static perimetry, microperimetry and rarebit perimetry in patients suffering from dry age related macular degeneration][Article in Polish]. Klin Oczna 109:131-4, 2007 PubMed
  15. van Dijk HW, Verbraak FD, Stehouwer M, Kok PH, Garvin MK, Sonka M, Devries JH, Schlingemann RO, Abramoff MD. Association of visual function and ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and no or minimal diabetic retinopathy. Vision Res 51: 224-8, 2011 PubMed
  16. Winther C, Frisén L. A compact rarebit test for macular diseases. Br J Ophthalmol 94: 324-327, 2010 PubMed

Top


Rarebits: meeting abstracts

  1. Agervi P, Nilsson M, Martin L. Foveal function in children treated for amblyopia. EVER Abstract, 2007.
  2. Anderson A, Hackett D, Pianta M. Death versus dysfunction in glaucoma: the relationship between threshold and miss rate for tiny perimetric stimuli. Abstract, International Perimetric Society Meeting 2012
  3. Bagnis A, Corallo G, Iester M, Scotto R, Calabria G, Traverso C. Rarebit perimetry: test-retest variability, long-term fluctuation and learning effect in healthy subjects. ARVO Abstract #1623/B254, 2007
  4. Brautaset R, Schalin S, Svanberg M, Nilsson M. Normal values for the Rarebit Fovea Test in children. EVER abstract, 2010. Acta Ophthalmol, 88: 0. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.498.x
  5. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Parisi L. Rarebit perimetry. A new non-conventional visual field testing method for early glaucomatous functional damage detection. Abstract, XVI Perimetry & Imaging Symposium, Barcelona 2004
  6. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Felletti M, Bais V. Early glaucoma detection: a comparison between scanning laser polarimetry with a variable corneal compensator and rarebit perimetry. Abstract, International Perimetry Society 2006
  7. Brusini P, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Rarebit perimetry in glaucoma. Abstract, Associazione Italiana Studio Glaucoma 2003
  8. Celebisoy N, Öztürk T, Köse T. Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of visual field defects in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. EUNOS Abstract 2009
  9. G Corallo G, Scotto R, Iester M. Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in subjects with ocular hypertension. Abstract, XVI Perimetry & Imaging Symposium, Barcelona 2004
  10. Coury D, Racine J, Rogers D. The Multiple Rarebit Test (DigitStep): feasibility study in a pediatric population. ARVO Abstract #3865, 2015
  11. Drudy ER, Newman SA. Reproducibility of rarebit perimetry in normal subjects. ARVO Abstract, 2005
  12. Dujmovic L, Bencic G, Vatavuk Z. The role of rarebit perimetry in evaluation of functional outcome after successful macular hole surgery. Abstract, Euretina Congress, 2013
  13. Gedik S, Oto S, Akman A, Akova YA. Efficiency of rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of patients with pseudotumor cerebri. Abstract, EUNOS 2007
  14. Greene DP, Houston III SK, Newman SA. Rarebit Perimetry: Number of test passes needed to identify visual field defects Abstract ARVO 2338/A588, 2010
  15. Hackett DA, Anderson AJ, P Brusini P. Threshold Responses in Glaucomatous Eyes in Areas of Visual Field Judged Normal with Rarebit Perimetry. Abstract, IPS 2010
  16. Hellgren K, Ygge J, Jacobson L, Hellström A, Flodmark O, Martin L. Visual function in 15 years-old subjects with very low birth weight - a population-based study. ARVO Abstract, 2005
  17. Houston III SK, Weber ED, Newman SA, Koga SF. Novel Applications of Rarebit Perimetry. ARVO Abstract 5353/A304, 2009
  18. Johnson C, Guthmille J, Garvin M, Kemp P. Structure-function relationships in the macula of glaucoma patients. Abstract, International Perimetric Society Meeting 2012
  19. Katsanos A, Labiris G, Pefkianaki M, Tsirouki T, Fanariotis M, Chatzoulis D. Rarebit perimetry. Correlation with OCT measurements. ARVO Abstract, 2007
  20. Katsanos A, Labiris G, Pefkianaki M, Tsirouki T, Chatzoulis D. Rarebit perimetry. learning effect in glaucoma patients. Abstract, 6th International Glaucoma Symposium, Athens 2007
  21. Martin L. Rarebit microdot perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Abstract, EVER 2003
  22. Martin L. FDT and rarebit perimetry in paediatric glaucoma and normal controls. Abstract, XVI Perimetry & Imaging Symposium, Barcelona 2004
  23. Martin L. Visual field testing in pediatric neuroophthalmology. Abstract, EUNOS 2007
  24. Martin L, Lundvall A, Gedda U, Wanger P. Measuring optic nerve structure and function in pediatric glaucoma. Abstract, European Glaucoma Society, Florence 2004
  25. Martin L, Lundvall Nilsson A. Rarebit visual field follow-up in pediatric glaucoma. EVER abstract 2009
  26. Martin L, Nilsson M, Wanger P. Macular abnormalities and the Rarebit Fovea Test. EVER Abstract, 2007
  27. Martin LM, Wanger P. A screening test for visual disorders based on Rarebit perimetry. Abstract, EVER 2008
  28. Mete M, Iester M, Zambelli A, Avallone M, Corallo G, Ferro C, Calabria G. Correlation Between Rarebit Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology in Glaucomatous Patients. ARVO Abstract, 2008.
  29. Newman SA. Rarebit: a novel perimetric strategy for detection of subtle optic nerve dysfunction. NANOS, Abstract 2005
  30. Newman SA. Rarebit Perimetry in Patients with Pituitary Adenomas. NANOS Abstract, 2008
  31. Newman, SA. Novel Applications of Rarebit Perimetry. NANOS Abstract, 2009
  32. Nilsson M, Granath H, Wahlberg M, Wanger P, Brautaset R. Fixation stability during the Rarebit Fovea Test. Abstract, EVER 2007
  33. Nilsson M, Henricsson A, Martin L. The effect of smoking on foveal function. EVER Abstract 2005
  34. Nilsson M, von Wendt G, Martin L. Rarebit Fovea Test in diabetes. Abstract, International Perimetry Society 2006
  35. Nilsson M, Martin L. A new test of foveal function using microdots. ARVO Abstract, 2005
  36. Öztürk F, Yavas GF, Küsbeci T, Ermis SS, Aydin P. A comparison among Humphrey Field Analyzer, Microperimetry and Rarebit Test in the evaluation of the macula in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Abstract, EUNOS 2007
  37. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L, Brusini P. Rarebit perimetry in normals: test-retest variability, learning effect, normatative range, influence of optical defocus and dataract extraction. ARVO Abstract, 2007
  38. Stehouwer M, Bronsema R, van Dijk HW, Kok PHB, Verbraak FD. Structural and Functional Changes of the Fovea in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 and No or Minimal Diabetic Retinopathy. ARVO Abstract 1395/A221, 2009
  39. Tilton EP, Newman SA. Rarebit Perimetry in Patients With Pituitary Tumors. ARVO Abstract, 2008.
  40. Tosoni C, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L, Felletti M, Brusini P. Non-conventional perimetric methods in the detection of early glaucomatous functional damage. Abstract, 6th International Glaucoma Symposium, Athens 2007
  41. Vislisel JM, Wall M, Johnson CA, Doyle CK, Woodward KR. Repeatability of Rarebit and Standard Automated Perimetry Sizes I and III in Normal Individuals. ARVO Abstract 2240/A182, 2009
  42. Wahlberg M, Brautaset R, Unsbo P, Lindskoog Pettersson A, Nilsson M. The influence of pupil size, accommodation and higher order aberrations on the retinal image of a Rarebit Fovea Test-stimulus. EVER abstract, 2007.
  43. Whitford S, Newman S. Rarebit: a novel perimetric strategy for detection of subtle optic nerve dysfunction. ARVO Abstract 2004; Abstract, XVI Perimetry & Imaging Symposium, Barcelona 2004
  44. Yavas GF, Aydin P, Küsbeci T, Eser O, Öztürk F. A new visual field testing in empty sella syndrome: rarebit perimetry. Abstract, EUNOS 2007


Top
End